IAN in the Media
This searchable database contains a list of articles published about the Integration and Application Network in the media. It is a subset of the UMCES in the Media database, which allows you to view articles from all University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science laboratories.
Articles can be browsed by date or searched based on words in the title, article text, periodical name, author, or IAN staff quoted. Records link to the original article on the periodical's website (NB These links may not always be available as they are often removed by the periodical a certain time after publication date).
Subscribe to the 'IAN in the Media' RSS Feed.
agricultural algae assessment blooms chesapeake bay choptank cleanup coastal coastal bays crabs creek dissolved oxygen earned ecosystem environmental epa estuary failing fertilizer flows forecast fowler funding grasses gulf habitat harbor health indicators louisiana marine monitoring nitrogen nutrients ocean overall oxygen oysters patapsco patuxent phosphorus pollution potomac predicted rains report card restoration river runoff seagrass sediment septic severn spill streams study tributaries underwater water quality watershed waterways weather wetlands zone
Select Year
Single Article
You are browsing a single article. You can browse/search by year/month, and search terms to view other articles in the database.
Virginia Water Central News (Wed 18 Apr, 2012)
Chesapeake Bay Report from U. Md. Shows Poorer Conditions in 2011
![]()
In April 2012, the University of Maryland's Center for Environmental Science released its annual "report card" on the status of biology and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. The Center analyzes state and federal agency data to see how close three water-quality indicators and three biological indicators are to established thresholds or goals, in response to pollution-reducing and habitat-improving actions and to annual precipitation variation. This year's report, for conditions in 2011, had an overall "grade" of 38%, rated a D+ or "poor ecosystem health"), compared to 42% (C- or "moderately poor ecosystem health) in 2010, and 46% (C or "moderate ecosystem health") in 2009. From 2010 to 2011, scores decreased for five of the six indicators—dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll a, water clarity, submerged aquatic vegetation (or "aquatic grasses"), and the benthic (bottom-dwelling) community—while the score increased for the phytoplankton community (floating, mostly microscopic plants).
